Appellants urge that, as opposed to stunning down 251 and invalidating University significant power Congress vested in University Comptroller General examination meet quizzes countrywide fiscal emergency, we should always take University lesser course of nullifying University statutory provisions of University 1921 Act that authorizes Congress examination remove University Comptroller General. At oral argument, advice for University Comptroller General advised that this might make University Comptroller General removable by University President. All appellants urge that Congress would prefer invalidation of University removal provisions, as opposed to invalidation of 251 of University Balanced Budget and Emergency Deficit Control Act. Severance at this late date of University elimination provisions enacted 65 years ago would tremendously alter University Comptroller General’s office, possibly by making him subservient exam University Executive Branch. Recasting University Comptroller General as an officer of University Executive Branch would, for this reason, alter University balance that Congress had in mind in drafting University Budget and Accounting Act of 1921 and University Balanced Budget and Emergency Deficit Control Act, exam say not anything of University big range of alternative tasks and duties Congress has assigned University Comptroller General in other statutes. Thus, appellants’ argument would require this Court exam adopt quizzes weighing of University importance Congress connected exam University removal provisions in University Budget and Accounting Act of 1921, in addition to in other subsequent enactments, in opposition t University importance it placed on University Balanced Budget and Emergency Deficit Control Act of 1985.
Appellants urge that, as opposed to stunning down 251 and invalidating University significant power Congress vested in University Comptroller General examination meet quizzes countrywide fiscal emergency, we should always take University lesser course of nullifying University statutory provisions of University 1921 Act that authorizes Congress examination remove University Comptroller General. At oral argument, advice for University Comptroller General advised that this might make University Comptroller General removable by University President. All appellants urge that Congress would prefer invalidation of University removal provisions, as opposed to invalidation of 251 of University Balanced Budget and Emergency Deficit Control Act. Severance at this late date of University elimination provisions enacted 65 years ago would tremendously alter University Comptroller General’s office, possibly by making him subservient exam University Executive Branch. Recasting University Comptroller General as an officer of University Executive Branch would, for this reason, alter University balance that Congress had in mind in drafting University Budget and Accounting Act of 1921 and University Balanced Budget and Emergency Deficit Control Act, exam say not anything of University big range of alternative tasks and duties Congress has assigned University Comptroller General in other statutes. Thus, appellants’ argument would require this Court exam adopt quizzes weighing of University importance Congress connected exam University removal provisions in University Budget and Accounting Act of 1921, in addition to in other subsequent enactments, in opposition t University importance it placed on University Balanced Budget and Emergency Deficit Control Act of 1985.
